big tits amateur movies

Old discussion

Is this appropriate as we already have a list of Erotic Actors? I would put a Delete tag on it, but I have done that twice tonight and hate to get in a rut. ]

BEST PAGE EVER

recommended for deleteion? you all mad?

Re: Removal of Plenty UpTopp link

In the event that no one read the edit summary to my edit: there was a reason I removed the link to the non existant article on Plenty UpTopp. The article on her was a VfD, whose consensus was to delete. (See: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Plenty up topp) -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 16:22, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Where do we draw the line?

Where exactly do we draw the line to consider a girl eligable for this list.

For instance, Pandora Peaks certainly qualifies by any standard. But Brittany Andrews, while she's a big girl by normal standards, isn't in anything like the same league.

If the purpose of this list is to name girls who are "freakishly" big, then quite a few names need to be deleted. If it's to list girls who just happen to be on the big side, then what's the point of the list really? Virtually ALL porn actresses are on the big side! Bob the Pirate 23:55, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

I do think that the women who are of at least DD cup or smaller need to be listed on a seperate section as they aren't that big. Danball1976 02:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I have to agree that Brittany is on the small size compared to the other women on this list, and that she is mainly a porn star as opposed to someone who gets modelling jobs strictly on the size of her bust. I guess the minimum breast size to be a good member of this list is a DD cup, which she and everyone else on this list possesses (I think). Jalabi99 15:38, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

this page ought not be just for those whom happen to be big, but for those whose entire imape is predicated on that fact 130.245.212.132 03:59, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Title

This article seems mistitled to me. These are mostly or entirely porn models, even those with legit work are more famous for their porn work than anything else. "models and performers" would suggest to me the inclusion of fashion models, and notables like Dolly Parton or Pamela Anderson. I'm also de-wikifying all the names with no articles so as to discourage the creation of stubs on non-notables.

...And I just read the page introduction. Now I get it. I still say the title is misleading. I suggest changing it to "List of models and performers in big-bust pornography". Plus, I forgot it was protected, obviously I'm not capable of de-wikifying it. Do we need to petition admins to get attention, or is there a group who regularly check protected pages' talk pages?

It was just protected yesterday, see the page history and you'll see why. A good place to propose moves would be Wikipedia:Requested moves; after posting a one-line message there, the discussion about whether to move would take place here, on this talk page. -- Curps 15:53, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

additions

How about adding Natalia! to the list?

• Please add Blake Mitchell. It's a redlink at the moment, but I plan to add an article on her in the near future. 24.71.223.140 20:08, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

• What about adding Jenny Hill? Her website is here: http://www.bbwjennyhill.com/

Danball1976 02:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

What is with the vandalism? I get that some people will find this stuff offensive, but whoever it is just comes in and deletes the same four or five names, over and over again. What on earth is the point of that? You'd think he or she would get bored, wreck the whole article or at least delete somebody else once in a while! Bob the Pirate 21:33, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

• And it's always before or after editing articles about football players. It's almost bot-like. tregoweth 23:55, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
  • It talks, though. ~⌈Mar ka ci ⌋

I added back some entries that may have been deleted in earlier vandalism, but perhaps some of these were legitimately deleted by other users later. Anybody knowledgeable on the subject might wish to take a look: -- Curps 05:16, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Deletion of Alicia 36 JJ

Why have you deleted her article? Dinno 14:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

• 06:15, May 11, 2006 Angr deleted "Alicia 36JJ" (A7 (no assertion of notability))
• 11:39, March 24, 2006 Jimfbleak deleted "Alicia 36JJ" (content was: ' Alicia 36JJ Born July 10, 1981 is glamour model who is known for her slim body and very large breasts. She began modeling in 2006, for a website...')

• I agree, she really needs to stay on this list.Danball1976 02:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • The Google test is not a good way of measuring notability, especially for subjects such as this one.-- h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• 11:55 PM, December 29, 2006 RaptorZX3 I Agree too, she must stay on the list, and by the way, her full name is Alicia Loren, the same name as a well-known actress in The Sopranos. I added her full name to the Big-bust list, with (model) at the end. I've see some peoples having the same name as a well-known show-business personnality, it's only a coincidence, but the reality is here.
  • Non-notable people and things don't get added to Wikipedia lists. This is why Encyclopedia Dramatica is not on the list of wikis.- h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Suggested cleaning

I would like to suggest that models without Wikipedia articles be removed from the list. As it is, anyone could make up a name and add it without it being questioned. Being notable enough for an article seems a good threshold for inclusion on the list. Thoughts? tregoweth 22:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

It's been over half a year, and I'm still seeing a lot of red-links. How do we know these people are notable - unless they have articles to match? I suggest we reconsider and remove redlinks pending articles. Rklawton 17:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Been quite awhile and several of these redlinks have gone nowhere, I deleted them to clean up the article some, probably a better format to create the stub THEN submit to here, with the intention of filling out the stub Charlam 00 22:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Um... Allanah Starr...

Allanah Starr has recently been added. Whilst Allanah Starr does indeed have a sizeable bust, Allanah Starr is nevertheless a man. Google image search it if you want proof and have a strong stomach. Brings up a rather interesting question of eligibility, does it not? BobThePirate 17:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• I don't think it's that big a deal -- s/he does trade on her large breasts as much as s/he does anything else. Though I will add a note that s/he's a transsexual. Haikupoet 16:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
  • From the lead in to the page : "This is a list of women known for modelling or performing..." So, is Allanah Starr a woman? Legally, I gather not. I'm curious as to whether Wikipedia has a policy on it. BobThePirate 17:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Assuming s/he's an American citizen, it probably isn't legally a big deal. The US is a country that legally recognizes transsexualism. Haikupoet 05:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Really? So a man can have a sex change op and then marry another man in the US? And in any case, the whole point here is that the "lady" in question isn't really a transsexual as such. "She" is a fully equipped guy with breast implants. Surely US law doesn't recognise that as a woman? btw, I don't object to her inclusion as such, I just wanted to raise the issue in case this became more common on the list without people realising. BobThePirate 15:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Suggest: Natsuko Tohnno

Why is Flo Jalin on here? She's not big. She's medium, compared to my two favorites, Eden Mor and Milena Velba. I want to learn German now and Hebrew or Arabic, whatever language she speaks. 64.241.230.3 20:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Agree Flo Jalin she should not be here

Models that are DD cup and smaller

Why on earth are models who are at least a DD cup or smaller listed? Those are not big. Danball1976 02:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Revert to former columnar format

I don't know who made the page into one long list, instead of its former, more compact columnar version. Can someone return it to that format, please? -- Jalabi99 06:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok, in Internet Explorer 7, this list is one long list. In Firefox 1.5.0.7, it shows up as the columnar version. Also for some reason, any entry past "I" will move in Firefox, making it hard to click on it. Danball1976 22:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

I changed the setup to a table format, 5 columns wide. Since I couldn't find an appropriate template that would make this list work as a columnar list in both Firefox and Internet Explorer, I did this way. It works very well,